||Thinking about PATH
is a team-facilitated graphic planning process that was developed by
Marsha Forest, Jack Pearpoint and John O'Brien (visit Inclusion Press
for the PATH
combines the best elements of a number of vision-building and future
planning tools, adds its own genius, and is one of the most useful tools for listening, planning and
community-building we've ever encountered.
and I learned PATH (the acronym stands for 'Planning Alternative Futures
with Hope') from Marsha and Jack over 15 years ago.
They taught us by facilitating our own personal PATHs and
explaining the thinking that was at the heart of each step.
We were surprised, delighted and inspired by the process, and
began using it in our work, eventually including it at the core of a
workshop we conduct on creative facilitation and community-building.
The Inclusion Press workbook is the 'authorized source', but we thought
we might add something about our own experiences and observations...
it's helpful to remember that PATH isn't a 'disability' tool. It's
a great generic process that can be used to define direction in ones own
life, design a building, develop an
organization, organize a community.
begins with the Dream. Your
vision. Asking what is it that you hope for, yearn for?
What is the dream you have for your life? What gift to you want to be bringing to the world?
What gives your life direction and meaning?
What's at the center? If
there were no barriers, how would you be living?
is in the realm of 'direction' - there are no limits.
It has to do with our heartfelt yearnings for connection,
meaning, relationships, contribution. When we're doing a PATH with a
child, or with someone who has great difficulty expressing himself, we
invite the people who care deeply about
person to add their vision, their dreams for a good life.
We always check in with the person at the center to make sure
that this expression matches their dream, but we also recognize
that good friends carry dreams for each other as well.
we say 'no limits', we understand that inside every dream there is an
important indicator of direction. If
someone who might have great learning challenges says that they want to
be a doctor, we put that on the PATH, and then ask what are the things
that a doctor does that are so important? "Well, she helps
people" (we put that on the PATH).
"She comforts people when they are feeling bad" (we put
that on the PATH). "She
is respected and admired" (we put that on the PATH).
Is it likely that Sarah will become a doctor?
Maybe not (or even probably not).
Is it possible that she can move in a direction that allows her
to help people, comfort people, and be admired and respected?
next step (the Goal) is a chance to develop a good sense of what is
achievable in a given amount of time. Positive,
possible movement towards the dream.
We ask the person what their life would be like if they were
doing effective work in the direction of their dream for 'a while' (long
enough to make some significant progress), perhaps a couple of
years (they choose the time-frame).
We encourage the person to imagine this as if it had already
says, "Well, in two years I'm volunteering at the hospital. And I'm
taking a class at the community college."
Great, Sarah, how
did that happen? "Well,
my mom knows the lady who helps people become Candy Stripers, and we
went to her office and met her ..."
At this point, Mom pipes up:
"She's right. When we told Cheryl about Sarah's gift for listening to older
people, she knew exactly how she could fit in".
Sarah is getting a sense of what she might be able to do in a year or so, and
also how it fits with her desire to help and comfort (one element in the
dream of being a doctor).
When she looks 'backwards' for the answer to "how did that
happen?", she's inventing a plan for making the connection.
By this time, Mom is also inventing, and seeing how she can
be part of making this all happen.
Now we know something about who else needs to be enrolled
(Cheryl, the Candy Striper coordinator), and some of the first steps
(call Cheryl, make a date...).
experience has been that if enough of the right people are present at
the PATH (Sarah's brother, the pastor from their church, their next-door
neighbour, etc.), they all begin to contribute ideas, solutions,
connections, action steps. More
importantly, they all begin to see their part in the picture.
The reason we like PATH so much is that it's partly a 'planning'
tool, but also a great tool for community-building, team-building, and commitment-building
[since we wrote this article, we developed this idea into a
Implementing Person-Centered Planning: Voices of Experience].
few months ago, we heard about a PATH that one of our students was
facilitating for a young man, involving his mother and a couple of
older sisters. At the end of the day, one of the sisters said,
"Mom, now I know what I can do to help Tom. Before this,
all I could see was you banging your head against a brick wall, and I
just couldn't see myself joining you in that. But now I see what
I can do".
the 'positive possible future' (the Goal) is developed, we do a quick
check-in about what's happening in the present (the Now).
What are the feelings, challenges, resources, obstacles,
commitments ... the current state of affairs?
The pathfinders begin to develop a clearer sense of the work that has to be done
in order to move effectively towards the goal.
order to fill the gap between 'Now' and what people sense can actually
be accomplished in a year or so, we can begin to identify:
finish with a check-in ... "How do you feel?"
A bit scared (that's okay, too).
thing that can help is remembering that PATH isn't an Individual Education
Plan (although you can derive an IEP from a PATH ... "What
can the school do to help Sarah along her path?").
It isn't a 'Program Plan' (although you can derive a
program plan from a PATH ... "What can our agency do that will help
Sarah and her family on this journey?").
It's Sara's PATH.
and I have had fifteen years of experience with this approach to
planning. We've learned how
to use and adapt PATH in situations that are very conflicted, confusing,
facilitated PATHs for projects, agencies, county boards, state-wide
programs, websites, people in business.
On a personal level, we invite friends to help us do our own PATH
every couple of years. The
one iron-clad ground rule is that you never facilitate someone else's
PATH until you've had your own done.
We teach PATH and other facilitation tools in workshops
(lots of practice, and everybody gets their own PATH done). Sometimes, workshop sponsors invite families to come with their
personal support circles. This keeps everything grounded and
strengthens parent / professional / community relationships. Sometimes
kids come with their school teams, parents, siblings, and friends.
Kids get their PATHs done and parents and professionals learn a lot
about each other.
The best workshops are diverse, including family members,
people with disabilities, professionals, and especially 'civilians':
grandmothers, architects, church leaders, environmentalists, artists, educators, business people, people involved in community
foundations, media people, legislators, high school
students, people involved in sports, etc. The message is, "these
are tools for change, for discovery, for community-building and
commitment-building" - not, "these are tools for disability,
and we want to recruit you into our disability scene".
Men and women with disabilities and their community allies make great
learning / practice teams. Our basic premise is that everyone learns,
everyone practices, everyone takes their turn in the graphic and
facilitation roles. In practice this means that some teams need to
create ways of assisting each other, sometimes developing two-person
graphic teams or two-person process facilitation teams. Many times,
people discover that their friends 'with disabilities' reflect great
understanding, insight, strategic thinking and artistry, and the
facilitation pattern turn out to be a powerful tool for expression and
leadership in the realm of self-advocacy.
© 2003 David and Faye Wetherow -